Tag Archives: sports medicine

Ultrasound Imaging in Sport: Seeing the Unseen to Shape the Season

Posted on by
Reply

May – the month when athletic champions are crowned, summer training programs ignite, and our collective spirit turns toward movement – is also National Physical Fitness and Sports Month. As we spotlight peak performance and injury prevention, one tool continues to gain ground in the world of sports medicine: ultrasound imaging.

Ultrasound imaging, long valued as a point-of-care diagnostic tool providing real-time evaluation of a variety of neuromusculoskeletal structures, has rapidly become an important component of the assessment and care of athletes in a variety of fitness and sports settings. Not only is ultrasound imaging used as a diagnostic tool to evaluate soft tissue injuries, but it has become increasingly important in the hands of sports medicine specialists for identifying risk factors for sports injuries before symptoms arise. This is where the conversation gets interesting!

A Season in the Life of a Tendon

A recent study by Savage et al (Inter J Physiother, 2024) used high-resolution ultrasound imaging to examine changes in tendon and bone health among Division I female volleyball athletes across their competitive season. The study examined body regions most injured in competitive volleyball players, including shoulders, knees, ankles, and feet, which have soft tissues that are under the most stress from the cumulative demands of repetitive jumping, landing, and hitting.

The findings? Over 90% of the athletes had preseason tendon or bony abnormalities despite most not reporting significant symptoms. Tendon cross-sectional area changed significantly over the course of the competitive season, particularly the Achilles and patellar tendons.

Ultrasound image displaying intrasubstance defects in a tendon, highlighting areas of concern for sports medicine assessment.

Significantly more athletes ended the season with sonographic abnormalities in four or more body regions than when they began the season.

Ultrasound image showing a cortical defect and hypoechoic tendon thickening in a patient's tendon, aiding in sports medicine diagnostics.

What does this mean? These Division I athletes had sonographic signatures of soft tissue strain and adaptation related to the physical demands of the competitive volleyball season. While many of these athletes remained asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, most were able to finish the competitive season.

However, recent study by Cushman et al (Orthop J Sports Med, 2024) found that baseline sonographic tendon abnormalities in athletes are predictive of future injury.

Ultrasound as a Performance Barometer

So, what are we looking at when we point the transducer? Tendon thickening? Focal hypoechoic zones? Calcaneal enthesophytes? Perhaps. But more broadly, we are capturing a physiological fingerprint of sport-specific loading. In this context, ultrasound imaging is more than just a diagnostic tool, it becomes a training and screening tool by:

  • Detecting early soft tissue changes before symptoms develop
  • Guiding load management strategies during the competitive season
  • Tracking recovery and response to training and interventions
  • Providing real-time comparison between limbs and soft tissues over time
Ultrasound image showing hypoechoic tendon thickening, indicating possible soft tissue changes.

These are just some examples of the value of ultrasound imaging in fitness and athletic settings, but this conversation echoes a growing trend in the sports medicine world: pairing point-of-care ultrasound imaging with athlete monitoring is an innovative application to better train and manage athletes before an injury sends them to the training room or sports medicine clinic.

Ultrasound image showing a tendon defect and a cortical defect with labeled arrows indicating their locations.

Don’t Diagnose in a Vacuum

Of course, not every tendon or bony abnormality seen on ultrasound imaging is teetering toward meaningful damage or an injury. As with all imaging modalities, ultrasound must be interpreted alongside the clinical examination, sport-specific demands, body composition variables, prior injuries, and functional status. That’s what makes the sports medicine specialist’s job so interesting! Being valuable stewards of this safe and cost-effective point-of-care technology means that ultrasound imaging can be used to amplify our clinical reasoning.

Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
As we celebrate athleticism this month, consider how ultrasound imaging can play a larger role in your sports medicine practice or training program by asking:

  • Can preseason scanning inform an athlete’s training program and load adjustments?
  • Can ultrasound imaging identify athletes at risk for developing an injury?
  • What stories are hidden beneath the surface – Are there other innovative applications of ultrasound imaging that can benefit fitness and sports enthusiasts?
  • How have you used ultrasound imaging to guide decisions about fitness programs or to the training and care of an athlete?

What have you seen? I would love to hear your comments and insights about how you are integrating ultrasound imaging into the science of movement! Comment or connect with me on LinkedIn (www.linkedin.com/in/nathan-savage-wssu) or X (@DrNathanJSavage).

Dr. Nathan J. Savage, PhD, DPT, RMSK, is an Associate Professor of Physical Therapy with expertise in neuromusculoskeletal ultrasound. His research focuses on integrating imaging into clinical decision-making for injury prevention, rehabilitation, and sports performance.

This posting has been edited for length and clarity. The opinions expressed in this posting are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the view of their employer or the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Improving Patient Care in Real-Time

Posted on by
Reply

The ability to diagnose and treat musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions with accuracy and efficiency is crucial for both practitioners and patients. Enter musculoskeletal ultrasound, a tool that has revolutionized how we approach these challenges, offering unparalleled real-time imaging and diagnostic capabilities.

Cristy Nicole French, MD, Chair of the AIUM’s Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Community, encapsulates the essence of this powerful technology: “The real-time nature of ultrasound provides the opportunity to interact with the athlete and correlate symptoms with sonographic findings. Patients enjoy this opportunity to ‘share their story’ and often provide critical information to the diagnostic puzzle.” Her words highlight one of the key advantages of MSK ultrasound—its ability to engage patients actively in their care. The immediate feedback loop between the patient’s symptoms and the visual data from the ultrasound helps clinicians piece together the diagnostic puzzle with greater accuracy.

This sentiment is echoed by Humberto Gerardo Rosas, MD, former AIUM Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Community Chair (2019–2021). He emphasizes the indispensable nature of MSK ultrasound in modern medicine: “Musculoskeletal ultrasound has become an indispensable tool in diagnosing and treating musculoskeletal conditions. It provides high-resolution, real-time imaging of the muscles, nerves, tendons, and ligaments, leading to precise evaluations and accurate diagnosis at a fraction of the cost of other modalities. The dynamic capabilities, unique to ultrasound, not only improves the diagnostic accuracy and assessment of the extent of injury but also helps direct more effective and personalized treatment plans. Additionally, it allows for image-guided interventions that afford precise needle placement and medication delivery. For patients, this means quicker, more targeted interventions and better outcomes, making musculoskeletal ultrasound a vital tool in modern sports medicine and orthopedic care.”

The dynamic nature of ultrasound enhances the accuracy of diagnostics and serves as a guide for interventions, ensuring that treatments are effective and tailored to each patient’s unique needs. This level of personalized care, coupled with ultrasound’s cost-effectiveness and convenience, has made it a cornerstone of patient management in MSK medicine.

As we continue to push the boundaries of what is possible in medicine, MSK ultrasound stands out as a prime example of how technology can enhance the human element of care. By offering a window into the body that is both immediate and detailed, it enables clinicians to make informed decisions that lead to better outcomes for their patients. Whether it’s diagnosing a complex injury or guiding a precise intervention, the impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound is profound and far-reaching, cementing its place as an essential tool in the future of healthcare.

Cynthia Owens, BA, is the Publications Coordinator for the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM).

Interested in reading more about musculoskeletal ultrasound? Check out these posts from the Scan:

An Invaluable Tool in Your Practice: Musculoskeletal Ultrasound

Posted on by
Reply

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK US) has emerged as a powerful tool that is advancing pediatric sports medicine. Its noninvasive nature, real-time imaging capabilities, and portability make it invaluable for injury assessment and treatment planning. Let’s delve into some key points:

  • Utility in Sports Medicine: The American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) developed a recommended MSK US curriculum for sports medicine fellows in 2010 to help guide programs towards adequate training during their fellowship to meet the requirements of competency outlined by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) Training Guidelines for the Performance of MSK US Examination. This was later revised in 2015 and it was where the term “sports ultrasound” was first introduced to reflect the use of ultrasound by sports medicine physicians for both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal indications.  Since then, sports US has become nearly ubiquitous in sports medicine clinics, training rooms, and at sporting events across the country. Finally, in 2017, ultrasound training was formally added to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core program requirements for sports medicine fellowships, including pediatric-based programs.
  • Pediatric Considerations: Skeptics may argue that ultrasound isn’t necessary for evaluating musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints in children, assuming they don’t experience the same amount of pathology as adults. However, as a pediatric sports medicine physician with a decade of ultrasound experience, I can attest that children do encounter similar MSK issues. Children exhibit both common MSK conditions (like tendinosis, ligament tears, muscle injuries, effusions, and fractures) and unique ones related to their growing skeletons (like osteochondral defects, Salter Harris injuries, apophysitis, and avulsion fractures). MSK US can play a role in evaluating all of these conditions at the point of care. 
  • Beyond Pediatric Sports Medicine: MSK Ultrasound is a valuable tool that extends beyond pediatric sports medicine as well. It is widely used in rheumatology clinics, where it helps diagnose conditions like synovitis, arthritis, and enthesitis. Emergency physicians can quickly identify joint effusions and dislocations, full-thickness tendon tears, and fractures, influencing acute management decisions. General pediatricians can benefit from MSK ultrasound, too, and this is not just ordering ultrasounds to rule out hip dysplasia in infants. Simple questions—like distinguishing between solid versus cystic soft tissue masses and assessing joint effusions—can guide primary care clinicians. When families seek answers about their child’s condition and treatment options, especially “How can we get them back to sports safely?” time is of the essence and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) becomes even more important!
  • Interventional Possibilities: While the volume of procedures may not match clinics focused on older athletes, there are still opportunities for the pediatrician. US guidance opens the door to injections of not only joints and their recesses but also within tendon sheaths, bursa, and perineural spaces. Therapeutic injections have their obvious role in successful treatment of pathologic conditions, but diagnostic injections can also play a crucial role, especially for patients with chronic pain. Precise targeting using ultrasound ensures accurate delivery of anesthetic injectates that can help inform the clinician of the etiology of pain, which often goes undiagnosed for years in the more challenging patient scenarios.         
  • Safety and Efficiency: Sonologists with diagnostic expertise can now confidently guide needles to precise locations, minimizing risks. Unlike radiography, which involves radiation exposure, ultrasound is radiation-free. This safety aspect is crucial, especially when discussing imaging options with pediatric patients and their families. For example, repeating radiographs or imaging contralateral sides for comparisons may be unnecessary if the pediatric clinician has POCUS in their toolbox.   

In summary, MSK ultrasound is a versatile tool that empowers clinicians across pediatric specialties to make informed decisions and provide better patient care. I challenge you to take advantage of all the great MSK US resources available through the AIUM and ask yourself how you could start incorporating this tool into your practice.

Drew Duerson, MD, RMSK, is a Sports Medicine physician in the Division of Sports Medicine at Nationwide Children’s Hospital. He is also a clinical associate professor of Pediatrics at the Ohio State University. Drew is a board-certified Pediatrician with a certificate of added qualification in Sports Medicine. He also holds a POCUS Musculoskeletal certification from the Alliance for Physician Certification and Advancement. 

Drew.Duerson@nationwidechildrens.org

@pedsmskusdoc

Drew Duerson, MD, RMSK

Interested in reading more about MSK ultrasound? Check out these on-demand webinars from the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM):

The Game-Changing Use of Ultrasound on the Sideline: Revolutionizing Sports Medicine

Posted on by
Reply

In the world of sports, injuries are an unfortunate reality that athletes must face. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is crucial to ensure timely treatment and minimize downtime. Traditionally, athletes would have to undergo imaging scans off-site, resulting in delays and limited access to immediate medical care. However, with recent advancements in medical technology, ultrasound has emerged as a game-changing tool. The terms, “venue ultrasound” and “sideline ultrasound” refer to the use of ultrasonography at a sports venue, in a stadium, on the sideline of a sporting event, or in the athletic training room. Its portability and real-time imaging capabilities make it an invaluable asset for sports medicine providers. In fact, the pilot investigation using venue ultrasound at the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games was successful in diagnosing injuries among athletes.1

Portable and Convenient
Ultrasound technology has undergone significant advancements, making it more compact, portable, and user-friendly. Modern handheld ultrasound devices are lightweight, battery-operated, and can be easily transported to sporting events or training facilities. This portability allows medical professionals to perform immediate on-site evaluations, enabling faster diagnosis and treatment decisions. The technology continues to evolve with many pocket-sized, handheld devices by leading manufacturers. Examples include the Philips Lumify, GE Vscan, Sonosite iViz, Butterfly iQ, Viatom, and Clarius. In addition, many of the units allow for easy wireless exchange of images and remote access by off-site professionals, if further assistance is needed.

Real-Time Imaging
One of the most significant advantages of sideline or venue ultrasound is its ability to provide real-time imaging. Unlike other imaging modalities, such as X-ray (XR) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which require athletes to wait for results, ultrasound allows for immediate visualization of internal structures. This real-time feedback empowers medical staff to make quick and accurate diagnoses, as well as enables expedited triage of acute athlete conditions. This is particularly useful when XR is not readily available, which is commonplace at many events, particularly non-stadium venues.

Injury Assessment and Diagnosis
Portable handheld ultrasound devices can accurately assess soft tissue injuries, detect fractures, evaluate joint stability, and identify potential nerve or vascular involvement. During the last Olympics, ultrasound showed 100% accuracy in cases that underwent confirmatory imaging.1 In the emergency department (ED), which can be a similar setting to the sports sideline, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) enables appropriate medical decision-making using real-time imaging. Applications of POCUS for musculoskeletal conditions in the ED include joint effusions, long bone fractures, and muscle and tendon injuries.2 Long bone fractures can be excluded and tendon injuries can be diagnosed by physicians in the ED using POCUS with high sensitivity and specificity.3,4 Further, POCUS in the ED positively impacts medical decision-making for musculoskeletal complaints.5

Monitor Healing
Once an injury has occurred, ultrasound can be used to monitor the healing progress during the rehabilitation phase. Regular ultrasound assessments allow medical staff to evaluate tissue repair, assess the formation of scar tissue, and track the restoration of normal function. This real-time monitoring provides valuable insights into an athlete’s recovery trajectory, enabling adjustments to treatment plans as needed. This can be particularly helpful in athletic training room situations in determining time to return to play.6

Additional Applications
Sideline ultrasound has numerous applications in the care of athletes, including trauma assessments and guided injections. One notable application is the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) exam, which is a POCUS examination used to evaluate potential internal injuries, particularly within the abdomen and chest, in the context of acute trauma. While the FAST exam has more traditionally been utilized in the ED, it is becoming increasingly popular on the sideline. The exam involves using ultrasound to evaluate specific regions of the body quickly, aiding in the identification of potential organ damage or bleeding. It allows for rapid assessment and triage regarding further medical interventions or necessary actions. Meanwhile, ultrasound-guided injections and interventions have long been an essential component of sports medicine. The addition of ultrasound guidance enables medical providers to be more targeted in their treatments.

Limitations and Future Directions
While venue ultrasound has enhanced sports medicine, it is essential to acknowledge its limitations. The depth of penetration, image quality, time from injury, and operator dependence can impact the accuracy of diagnoses. Continued advancements in technology and ongoing training for sports medicine professionals are crucial to maximize the potential of sideline ultrasound.

Conclusion
The use of ultrasound on the sideline has revolutionized sports medicine, enabling rapid and accurate diagnosis of injuries. Its portability, real-time imaging capabilities, and dynamic ability to assess musculoskeletal injuries make it an invaluable tool for healthcare professionals on the sideline and in the training room. With further advancements, ultrasound’s role in sports medicine is poised to continue expanding, benefiting athletes worldwide by providing more immediate and personalized care. For further information on this topic, consider reviewing the AIUM webinar, Sideline Ultrasound (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX-AibSfctc).

Robert Monaco and Lauren Rudolph.
Robert Monaco, MD, MPH, RMSK, is a physician at Atlantic Sports Health and is a team physician for USA Figure Skating. Lauren Rudolph, MD, is a physician at Boulder Biologics, adjunct faculty for ultrasound education at Rocky Vista University, and a traveling physician with the US Ski team.

References:

  1. Onishi K, Engebresten L, Budgett R, Soligard T, Forster BB. The International Olympic Committee venue ultrasound program: A pilot study from Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2023; 102:449–453. 
  2. Chen KC, Lin A, Chong CF. et al. An overview of point-of-care ultrasound for soft tissue and musculoskeletal applications in the emergency department. J Intensive Care 2016; 4:55.
  3. Waterbrook AL, Adhikari S, Stolz U, Adrion C. The accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound to diagnose long bone fractures in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2013; 31:1352–1356.
  4.  Wu TS, Roque PJ, Green J, et al. Bedside ultrasound evaluation of tendon injuries. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 30:1617–1621.
  5. Situ-LaCasse E, Grieger RW, Crabbe S, Waterbrook AL, Friedman L, Adhikari L. Utility of point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound in the evaluation of emergency department musculoskeletal pathology. World J Emerg Med 2018; 9:262–266.
  6. Bailowitz Z, Visco C, Christen K, Ahmad C. Diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound for the acute evaluation and management of soccer players. Curr Sports Med Rep 2021; 20: 525–530.

Musculotendinous Ultrasound Imaging Applications in Sports Medicine

Posted on by
Reply

There is a clearly established role of ultrasound imaging in traditional medical contexts to optimize patient assessment and subsequent care. These same applications have been carried over into sports medicine settings, especially with recent developments in ultrasound portability. Such technological advancements enable athletic trainers and other sports medicine clinicians to perform sideline assessments for athletes who sustain musculoskeletal injuries during sports.

Beyond diagnostic applications of ultrasound imaging, sports medicine clinicians and researchers have begun to adopt this tool as a creative means to assess musculotendinous structures in response to sport and exercise. Ultrasound imaging has advantages over other measurement techniques given that it is relatively inexpensive equipment, fairly easy to operate (especially if you know your anatomy!), and can be rapidly implemented into assessments. Ultrasound imaging also enables clinicians to perform more dynamic assessments with patients to understand functional movement patterns, and noninvasively examine deeper tissue structures. The real-time visual platform uniquely provides the opportunity to enhance patient-clinician dialogue and provide feedback to target key muscle groups during fundamental exercises.

Below, several exemplary studies that leverage ultrasound imaging in musculotendinous contexts are presented to convey the depth and breadth of innovation in the sports medicine field and highlight opportunities for future ultrasound implementation into practice.

Muscle Morphology

Ultrasound has been most frequently implemented in sports medicine research to conduct table-top assessments of musculotendinous structures. This measurement approach provides insights to clinicians on patients’ muscle and tendon changes in response to exercise (eg, weight- and height-adjusted size, fiber arrangement and quality). For example, researchers have been able to examine lower limb musculotendinous responses across long-distance running training.1,2 Beyond training adaptations, clinicians are also able to get some insights into structural tissue changes in the presence of current or future musculoskeletal injury. This has specifically been done to examine musculotendinous adaptations at the shoulder complex,3 foot complex,4 and lumbopelvic hip complex5 across a range of pathological populations. Preliminary work has begun to identify signals in tendon tissue quality that relate to future pain in running athletes.1 Such studies will continue to help inform rehabilitative and training interventions to improve muscle and tendon quality to move toward injury risk reduction in sports medicine.

Dynamic Muscle Function

In addition to the role of ultrasound imaging in more static imaging contexts, ultrasound has been implemented in sports medicine research in more functional contexts. Researchers have inventively started to use foam blocks with Velcro elastic belts to secure portable ultrasound probes on patients to visualize deep lumbopelvic hip muscles across a range of exercises and movements to assess the role of these muscles during fundamental movements (Figure).6 Through this approach, researchers have examined athletes’ transverse abdominis muscle thickness during an abdominal draw-in maneuver across patient positions to determine which activity elicited the most “bang for your buck” in muscle activity.7 Additionally, this measurement approach has been used to assess gluteal muscle function throughout treadmill walking. In these instances, ultrasound videos were obtained to quantify muscle activity throughout movement and identify activity dysfunction among patients with lower limb injuries.8,9 These examples emphasize the utility of ultrasound imaging to supplement typical sports medicine clinical assessments and underscore the opportunity for clinicians to implement ultrasound imaging in more dynamic assessments.

An athlete with ultrasound probes attached to her leg. A screen in the fore ground shows the ultrasound image.

Real-time Feedback

Ultrasound imaging demonstrates great promise as a rehabilitative feedback tool for patients who have difficulty recruiting specific muscle groups as a result of injury.10 The most robust use of ultrasound for feedback has been taking dynamic assessments of the lumbopelvic hip complex muscles a step further and using ultrasound to allow patients to visualize their muscles during abdominal contraction exercises. In this manner, clinicians have been able to show patients their muscle activity, and encourage activation of select muscles during rehabilitative exercises. This approach has been found to be more successful for patient neuromuscular education than other feedback approaches, such as verbal encouragement. The visual interface not only helps patients to see and understand muscle recruitment in real time but also helps clinicians to see when patients are able to activate proper stabilizing muscle groups as opposed to “cheating” on an exercise and using global movers to achieve a movement. While there is less available information on the use of ultrasound for feedback for targeting other muscle groups during rehabilitation, these studies highlight the opportunities for ultrasound imaging to maximize patient benefit during clinical interventions.

The Future of Ultrasound in Sports Medicine

Ultrasound imaging can clearly play a key role in sports medicine assessments and interventions. Continued research is necessary to broaden our understanding of musculotendinous changes in relation to sports injuries and rehabilitation, as current research is still scraping the surface of ultrasound opportunities in sports. Ultrasound assessments may complement other forms of athlete assessments and provide more in-depth insights into muscle and tendon function in relation to performance and injury. It is plausible that with continued technological advancements and the miniaturization of ultrasound units, clinicians may be able to use imaging during more sport-specific activities at higher velocities to unearth real-time musculotendinous changes in physical activity. The prospects of ultrasound are promising, and this tool may continue to revolutionize patient care in sports medicine clinics.

References

  1. Cushman DM, Petrin Z, Eby S, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the patellar tendon and Achilles tendon and its association with future pain in distance runners. Phys Sportsmed. 2021; 49:410–419. doi:10.1080/00913847.2020.1847004.
  2. DeJong Lempke AF, Willwerth SB, Hunt DL, Meehan III WP, Whitney KE. Adolescent marathon training: prospective evaluation of musculotendinous changes during a 6-month endurance running program [published online ahead of print September 29, 2022]. J Ultrasound Med. doi:10.1002/jum.16105.
  3. Thomas SJ, Blubello A, Peterson A, et al. Master swimmers with shoulder pain and disability have altered functional and structural measures [published online ahead of print April 13, 2021]. J Athl Train. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-0067.21.
  4. Fraser JJ, Koldenhoven R, Hertel J. Ultrasound measures of intrinsic foot muscle size and activation following lateral ankle sprain and chronic ankle instability. J Sport Rehabil 2021; 30:1008–1018. doi:10.1123/jsr.2020-0372.
  5. Dieterich AV, Deshon L, Strauss GR, McKay J, Pickard CM. M-Mode ultrasound reveals earlier gluteus minimus activity in individuals with chronic hip pain during a step-down task. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016; 46:277–285. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6132.
  6. DeJong AF, Mangum LC, Hertel J. Ultrasound imaging of the gluteal muscles during the Y-balance test in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train 2019; 55:49–57. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-363-18.
  7. Mangum LC, Henderson K, Murray KP, Saliba SA. Ultrasound assessment of the transverse abdominis during functional movement: Transverse abdominis during movement. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37:1225–1231. doi:10.1002/jum.14466.
  8. DeJong AF, Mangum LC, Hertel J. Gluteus medius activity during gait is altered in individuals with chronic ankle instability: An ultrasound imaging study. Gait Posture 2019; 71:7–13. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.007.
  9. DeJong AF, Koldenhoven RM, Hart JM, Hertel J. Gluteus medius dysfunction in females with chronic ankle instability is consistent at different walking speeds. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2020; 73:140–148. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.01.013.
  10. Valera-Calero JA, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Varol U, Ortega-Santiago R, Gallego-Sendarrubias GM, Arias-Buría JL. Ultrasound imaging as a visual biofeedback tool in rehabilitation: An updated systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(14):7554. doi:10.3390/ijerph18147554.

Alexandra F. DeJong Lempke, PhD, ATC, is a clinical assistant professor of Applied Exercise Science, co-director of the Michigan Performance Research Lab, and a member of the Exercise & Sport Science Initiative within the U-M School of Kinesiology.

Interested in reading more about MSK ultrasound? Check out these posts from the Scan:

The Role of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Sports Injuries

Posted on by
2

Approximately 20% of the U.S. population engaged in sports or exercise on a daily basis from 2010–2019.1 As expected, exercise and sports-related injuries are common, not only in the elite athlete but also in the general population. These injuries frequently lead to sport participation absence (SPA) and often, contact with the health care system. Although history and physical examination are the primary tools of diagnosis, musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK US) has become the “stethoscope” for evaluation of sports medicine patients.

Even though MSK US has been widely used in Canada and Europe for years, the dramatic utilization increase in the United States has only occurred over the last two decades.2, 3 Between 2003 and 2015, there was a 347% increase in total MSK US volume within the Medicare population.3 The growth in subspecialties such as physical medicine and rehabilitation, rheumatology, and sports medicine has outpaced the growth in radiology. This Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) by clinicians may help facilitate diagnosis, expedite treatment planning, and reduce patient wait time and number of visits by offering one-stop clinics. 

Cristy Nicole French, MD
Cristy Nicole French, MD

POCUS can be quite useful to evaluate sports injuries. Propelled by advances in technology, the advent of compact, portable, and more affordable ultrasound machines may facilitate prompt diagnosis of sports injuries on the field and in the training room. The real-time nature of ultrasound provides the opportunity to interact with the athlete and correlate symptoms with sonographic findings. Patients enjoy this opportunity to “share their story” and often provide critical information to the diagnostic puzzle. They also appreciate the immediate findings the physician may be able to provide at the time of imaging. In fact, most patients actually prefer ultrasound to MRI.4 Other unique advantages of MSK US for sports imaging are the ability to easily assess the contralateral side as a control and the capability for dynamic imaging. Ultrasound guidance can also improve accuracy in targeted percutaneous injection therapies.4 Sports clinicians often encounter a treatment gap for a substantial percentage of young, active patients with a strong desire to return to activity, yet for whom conservative measures have failed and surgery is not indicated. Fueled by media coverage of the treatment of high-profile professional athletes, the field of orthobiologics has exploded in recent years. Ultrasound can provide target localization during administration of a wide array of injectable agents (prolotherapy, autologous whole blood, and platelet-rich plasma) in addition to image-guided peritendinous corticosteroid injections, tendon needling or fenestration, and even percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (Tenex).

With the development of high-frequency transducers, MSK US has equal diagnostic accuracy to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of many superficial tendon and ligament abnormalities. In the current era of cost containment, the utilization of MSK US as an alternative to other more expensive imaging modalities may represent an effective way to save healthcare dollars.5, 6 However, many issues related to accuracy, observer variability, and high-quality training need to be considered, aside from pure economics, to ensure that MSK US is ethically and adequately performed in the best interest of patient care.

As any of us who have picked up a transducer know, some of the most significant disadvantages of ultrasound are the relatively long learning curve and inherent operator dependence. These challenges are compounded in MSK US by the complex anatomy, pathology, and terminology not often included in general ultrasound education programs. Dedicated training and standardized technique can minimize these limitations. Many subspecialty residency and fellowship programs have recognized the necessity of standardized, high-quality training and have strategically designed curricula to become proficient in the core competencies of MSK US.

In recent years, quantitative ultrasound methods, such as shear-wave elastography (SWE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, have emerged as an adjunct tool to standard B-mode imaging in the evaluation of various structures throughout the body. In particular, SWE has seen an exponential increase in the number of musculoskeletal applications. Shear-wave elastography can assess tissue stiffness by applying a mechanical stress that generates shear waves, which then travel through the tissue at a speed proportional to its stiffness. By quantifying mechanical and elastic tissue properties, SWE may provide important information about pre-clinical injuries in musculoskeletal tissues as well as tissue healing after injury. Although SWE is FDA-approved on most ultrasound platforms, its use for clinical imaging in musculoskeletal ultrasound has lagged behind research due to lack of standardization in study protocols, techniques, and outcomes measures. Nonetheless, SWE has a promising role in the future of ultrasonography in sports medicine and may help practitioners to better estimate injury severity and individualize the retraining plan for the injured athlete.

References

  1. Hauret KG, Bedno S, Loringer K, Kao TC, Mallon T, Jones BH. Epidemiology of Exercise- and Sports-Related Injuries in a Population of Young, Physically Active Adults: A Survey of Military Servicemembers. Am J Sports Med. Nov 2015;43(11):2645-53. doi:10.1177/0363546515601990
  2. Sharpe RE, Nazarian LN, Parker L, Rao VM, Levin DC. Dramatically increased musculoskeletal ultrasound utilization from 2000 to 2009, especially by podiatrists in private offices. J Am Coll Radiol. Feb 2012;9(2):141-6. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.09.008
  3. Kanesa-Thasan RM, Nazarian LN, Parker L, Rao VM, Levin DC. Comparative Trends in Utilization of MRI and Ultrasound to Evaluate Nonspine Joint Disease 2003 to 2015. J Am Coll Radiol. Mar 2018;15(3 Pt A):402-407. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.10.015
  4. Nazarian LN. The top 10 reasons musculoskeletal sonography is an important complementary or alternative technique to MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 2008;190(6):1621-6. doi:10.2214/ajr.07.3385
  5. Parker L, Nazarian LN, Carrino JA, et al. Musculoskeletal imaging: medicare use, costs, and potential for cost substitution. J Am Coll Radiol. Mar 2008;5(3):182-8. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2007.07.016
  6. Bureau NJ, Ziegler D. Economics of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. Curr Radiol Rep. 2016;4:44. doi:10.1007/s40134-016-0169-5

Dr. Cristy French (Twitter: @cristy_french) is an Associate Professor in the Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology at Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. She is the Director of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound as well as the Musculoskeletal Fellowship Director.

Ultrasound-Guided Musculoskeletal Injections

Posted on by
2

I began using Musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasound (US) in 2010. It has been incredibly exciting to observe the growth of applications of this amazing technology for both myself personally as well as for the entire MSK US practicing community. MSK US has become an integral part of my Sports Medicine practice and I certainly anticipate its’ role to continue to expand and be able to provide cutting-edge medical care to my patients.IMG_8265

There is great variability with which MSK US is used among practitioners. Some providers do complete diagnostic scans of the shoulder, for example, to evaluate the extent of a potential rotator cuff tear to guide with potential surgical decision making, while others perform selective nerve blocks and finally, some practitioners simply use it to assist with the accuracy of various MSK joint and soft tissue injections. I would like to illustrate to all of you the applications for which I most commonly use MSK US to improve patient care.

Probably the most common application for which I use MSK US is to assist with the accuracy of joint and soft tissue injections. It has been clearly documented that MSK US improves the accuracy of certain MSK injections. While I do not use MSK US for all injections, ie, simple knee intra-articular and shoulder sub-acromial injection, I routinely employ MSK US to assist with certain injections. Common joints and soft tissue areas for which I employ MSK US for either cortisone or pro-inflammatory injections like Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) are:

Shoulder: Glenohumeral and acromioclavicular joint and long head biceps tendon sheath

Hip: Femoroacetabular, hamstring origin (tendon or bursa), mid-portion hamstring, pubic symphysis, gluteal tendons and bursa, iliopsoas bursa and tendon

Knee: Pes anserine and iliotibial bursae, patella and quadriceps tendons, Baker’s cyst aspiration

Wrist: Triangular fibro cartilage complex (TFCC), various wrist extensor and flexor tendons, aspirate ganglion cysts, numerous hand and wrist joints

Elbow: Lateral and medial epicondyle area, triceps insertion, olecranon bursitis, distal biceps and intra articular

Ankle: Achilles, tibialis posterior, peroneal tendons, numerous foot and ankle joints, plantar fascia

Back: Sacroiliac joint

I would also like to illustrate some interesting recent cases supporting the utility of MSK US in a Sports Medicine practice.

I am consulted numerous times a week by my orthopedic surgeon colleagues for diagnostic joint injections. Oftentimes, a patient’s hip pain may be multifactorial or difficult to specifically isolate. I will perform an intra-articular injection to see if it alleviates that patient’s pain, thus identifying that the area in which I placed the injection as the pain generating location. Correct identification of the pain generating source will help to assist with treatment considerations.

I also recently had a patient with greater than 1 year of hip pain. He had seen 8 different providers and had an extensive workup with imaging and injections only to have continued pain. He had hip joint and hamstring origin injections and felt no improvement. I was able to use the US to identify and isolate the obturator internus as the source of his pain by providing a diagnostic injection. This injection helped to make the appropriate diagnosis and ultimately influenced treatment.

Last month, an orthopedic surgeon asked me to evaluate a patient for refractory symptoms from a Baker’s cyst. The cyst persisted despite multiple intra articular-injections. I evaluated the cyst with US and noted that it was multilobulated. I was able to specifically aspirate each of the loculations and the patient has remained symptom-free.

I was also asked to see one of our varsity basketball players for refractory lateral knee pain. His athletic trainer was treating him with rehabilitation and multiple modalities but the pain persisted and was affecting the athletes’ ability to play. I was able to identify an inflamed Iliotibial band bursa with the US and subsequently inject it. He became pain-free and was able to play in that weeks’ game as well as the rest of the season.

Another exciting application of MSK US that has piqued my interest recently is the use of the US to assist with appropriately identifying the compartments of the lower extremity for chronic exertional compartment testing. I can employ the US to guarantee that I am in the appropriate anatomic compartment for testing.

With any new technology, the application and utility of MSK US can be user-dependent and it can be affected by a somewhat steep learning curve. MSK US curriculums are frequently being added to Sports Medicine fellowships to train some of the future leaders of medicine. I certainly anticipate that this technology with continue to evolve and its’ treatment applications will continue to expand.

How do you use MSK US? How has it improved your practice? Comment below or let us know on Twitter: @AIUM_Ultrasound.

Bryant Walrod, MD, CAQSM, is Assistant Professor: Clinical at Ohio State University, is Team Physician for the Ohio State Athletics, and practices at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.